This site is a part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

26 - 27 JUNE 2025
HALL 1 BENGALURU INTERNATIONAL EXHIBITION CENTRE, BANGALORE
Announcement :

100 + Safety and Health Equipment Manufacturers participating in OSH South India – Bangalore.

Visit OSH South India – Bangalore and avail reimbursement for your train travel.

South India’s Largest Occupational Safety & Health show is back in Chennai, June 27 – 28, 2024, Hall no. 1, Bangaluru International Exhibition Centre, Bangalore.. Book your stall in best Location : 7045909099.

Live demonstrations, Latest Innovations, Global Experts, Certification workshops.

Explore PPE such as hard hat, safety gloves, gas mask, safety shoes, work wear, safety harness under one Roof.

Regulating work in Co-Working Workplaces

The 'gig economy' which includes 'crowd-work' and 'work-on-demand via apps', is often seen as the future of work. And though it makes headlines nearly daily, many important questions regarding labour protection have yet to be addressed.

Crowd-work is work that is performed on on-line platforms by groups of individual workers, responding to on-line calls. It can include skilled jobs such as programming and translation to more routine jobs such as cleaning data, tagging photographs or compiling lists of books or movies that on-line customers may be interested in purchasing. The work is performed on-line by the ‘crowd’ who may live anywhere in the world so long as they are connected to the internet.

With ‘work-on-demand apps’, workers perform duties such as providing transport, cleaning, home repairs, or running errands, but the workers learn about these jobs through mobile apps. The jobs are performed locally.

Although there are important differences between the two types of work, they both facilitate a quick match between demand and supply, rendered possible by the internet and mobile technologies. The technology enables business and individuals to mobilize workers on a ‘pay-as-you-go’ basis, at the click of a button. It can also offer workers flexibility in their hours and place of work, and can be particularly attractive to workers who may be home-bound due to disability or other circumstances.

The challenge of regulating work

While the ‘gig economy’ can offer new opportunities, it also poses some important risks for workers that have yet to be addressed.

To begin with, we need to recognize that we are not talking about ‘gigs’, ‘tasks’, ‘favours’, or ‘rides’— but work. And work is done by workers.

Yet many of these workers have become invisible. When you stream a movie on-line, the site will recommend another movie you may like. This recommendation is based on information supplied by workers who have hand-tagged television shows and film for content, based on their knowledge. There is a worker behind the computer. But is this person benefiting from prevailing labour laws?

And in the cases where labour laws are applied, it is not always clear what to do when the worker is in India but the on-line platform is based in California and the client is in Germany. If there are workers from different parts of the world, which minimum wage law prevails? And how can workers ensure income security amidst such competition? Also, how flexible is working time when compensation is so low that one has to work very long hours to make a living?

Another challenge is eliminating the misclassification of employment status. Many on-line platforms are quick to dismiss any responsibility as employers, categorizing these workers as independent contractors. Some situations fall into a grey area and need to be addressed. But there are other cases of blatant misclassification, with important consequences for the worker today and in the future. The rise in the number of disputes and litigations on this issue indicates the need for responses.

In addition, workers have little recourse if their work is rejected by the ‘client’, giving rise to cases of wage theft. Workers risk becoming ‘unlisted’ (or in practice dismissed) if their star ratings fall, adding pressure to be always connected, always available and always cheerful.

There are also risks for the fundamental principles and rights at work. How can we ensure that work isn’t being performed by children? How can we ensure that compensation is not discriminatory? How can faceless workers spread across the world organize for better conditions?

Labour protection and technological innovation can be compatible

The ‘gig economy’ may be the future, but we have to begin by recognizing that it is indeed work and that the work should be decent. Labour protection is not incompatible with technological innovation – it just needs to be adapted.

  • Employee Assistant Programs (EAP)
  • Vaccination services
  • Health and Wellbeing checks
  • Supporting literature
  • Educational workshops and webinars
  • Employee recognition programs
  • These are very different activities and not all provided by occupational health, but all with the common goal to support the wellbeing of the workforce

Measuring Success

The success of a comprehensive health and wellbeing program speaks volumes when a company is building a business case for investment. The use of data is critical to measure success. Examples of this are reduced costs associated with absences due to proactive prevention and reduced costs associated with recruitment of new staff as motivated, healthy and engaged staff increase retention rates. Both examples can be easily measured with data on absence volumes and staff turnover rates. Other data indicators may include number of workplace accidents or changes in productivity and feedback directly from the workforce through employee surveys and recognition schemes.

When setting up a program it is important to define key metrics which will enable employers’ oversight of the success of the program. This will aid the case for reinvestment year after year. The best programs are usually those that evolve over time and follow a continuous improvement process that is established as a true partnership between the employees, the employer – and an external occupational health partner.

“When you want to move from good to great, you should have a systematic approach in place for continuous improvement and look at the data after 6, 12 month in relation to what you are doing, what can you improve on, what can you tweak, what can you invest in next – look at reinvesting some of the savings you gained from the improved wellbeing in the workplace.

Impact of a comprehensive Health & Wellbeing Program

Beside hard savings through decreased absence days and improved attrition, employers with comprehensive programs usually also observe soft savings through better engagement as well as a positive impact on the employee branding.

A comprehensive health and wellbeing program which is relevant and fully inclusive for the workforce encourages employees to actively engage and take ownership in improving their health. They do this by raising awareness, understanding and proactively identifying common health issues and outline simple ways to support employees lead healthier lifestyles.

Subscribe Newsletter

Sign up to receive E connect email updates